Sarfuddin Abubakar Ismail Contractor v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed on default as the petitioner was unrepresented. No substantive legal question was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dixit
WP-2811-11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2811 OF 2011
| Sarfuddin Abubakar Ismail Contractor V/s. |
… | Petitioner |
|---|---|---|
| The State of Maharashtra, | ||
| Thru' the Principal Secretary, | ||
| Ministry of Revenue & Forest, | ||
| Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai & Ors. | … | Respondents |
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sameer Patil, A.G.P., for Respondent Nos.1 and 3 to 5.
Mr. P.S. Dani for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE : 8 TH MAY, 2012.
P.C. :
[MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.] [S.A. BOBDE, J.]
1/1
Sarfuddin Abubakar Ismail Contractor
The State of Maharashtra
S.A. Bobde
Mridula Bhatar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court