Writ petition was allowed to be withdrawn. The judgment disposes of the matter by granting permission to withdraw.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skc
WP-2799-11
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 2799 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Mr. Vineet Naik with Mr. Sukand Kulkarni for Petitioner.
Mrs. M. P. Thakur - Assistant Government Pleader for State – Respondents.
CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND
SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. 10 January 2012
P.C. :
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the State – Respondents.
Learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission granted. Letters dated 7.1.2012 and 4.1.2012 are placed on record.
In the circumstances, writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(D. D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
Petitioner
State
D. D. Sinha
V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
