The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, disposed of Writ Petition No. 2798 of 2006 as infructuous at the instance of counsel for the petitioner, with no orders as to costs.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous with no orders as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2108wp2798.06
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
W.P. NO. 2798 OF 2006
Dashrath Pandu Rathod VERSUS State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri Nachiket Aamte Adv h/f Shri A. V. Khare counsel for the petitioner. Shri K. L. Dharmadhikari AGP for respondents 1 & 2.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 21, 2012 .
Learned counsel Shri Nachiket Aamte holding for Shri A. V. Khare the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the cause for filing this Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous due to passage of time and this Writ Petition may be disposed of as such.
On the statement made on behalf of the petitioner the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous with no orders as to costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
svk
Dashrath Pandu Rathod
State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A. Naik
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
