Petitioners sought permission to withdraw a criminal writ petition after the investigating agency filed a B Summary Report. The court granted permission, disposed of the petition as withdrawn with liberty to reappear.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; disposed as withdrawn with liberty to reappear if there is an adverse order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 279 OF 2012
(Ajit Bhawarlal Jain and Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.)
| Office Notes, |
Office | |
|---|---|---|
| Memoranda of | Coram, | |
| appearances, |
Court’s |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
| orders or directio Registrar’s orders |
ns and | |
| Mr. K.C. Sant, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. K.J. Ghute-Patil, A.P.P. for State. Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya h/f. Mr. R.F. Totla, Advocate for respondent No. 2. |
||
| CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 13th June, 2012. |
||
| PER COURT : | ||
| 1. The advocate for the petitioners submitted that | ||
| he has information that after getting investigation, the investigating agency has filed "B" Summary Report. In |
||
| view of this circumstance, he seeks permission to | ||
| withdraw the matter. Permission is granted. Petition is | ||
| disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach the | ||
| Court again, if there is any adverse order. Advocate Mr. | ||
| P.K. Lakhotiya holding for Mr. R.F. Totla appears for respondent No. 2. |
||
| [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] ssc/ |
Ajit Bhawarlal Jain and Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
T. V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
