A writ petition seeking premature release of a jail petitioner was disposed of after the Prosecution counsel stated a fresh proposal was forwarded to the appropriate authority.
Petition disposed with hope that appropriate authority shall take necessary decision on the proposal expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vss
wp.2676.2012.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.2676 OF 2012
Mohammad Shafi Sardar Patel ... Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharshtra .... Respondent
Mr.K.V. Saste, APP, for the Respondent - State
CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR & A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED: 8.8.2012
P.C.:
premature release of the petitioner has already been forwarded to the appropriate authority. In that case, no further direction is required in the
present petition. The same is disposed of with a hope that the appropriate authority shall take necessary decision on the proposal expeditiously.
(A.R. JOSHI, J.) (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.)
vss 1 of 1
Mohammad Shafi Sardar Patel
The State of Maharshtra
A.M. KHANWILKAR
A.R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
