Dismissed
Shri. Pandurang Naik and 4 Ors., v. Jain Udyog and 5 Ors.
Bombay HCWP/239/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 239…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 239 OF 2008
SHRI. PANDURANG NAIK AND 4 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus JAIN UDYOG AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents
Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Y. V. Nadkarni, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. D. Lawande, Advocate for respondent no.2.
Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. M. Salkar, Government Advocate for respondent nos.3, 4 and 6.
Coram:A. P. LAVANDE & U. V. BAKRE, JJ. Date:24th January, 2012
P.C.
Mr. Sonak, learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of affidavit dated 18th January, 2012 filed on behalf of respondent no.1, the cause of action in the present petition no more survives.
A. P. LAVANDE, J.
U. V. BAKRE, J.
SMA
SHRI. PANDURANG NAIK AND 4 ORS.
JAIN UDYOG AND 5 ORS.
A. P. LAVANDE
U. V. BAKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court