Writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. Neither party was present in court.
The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2347 OF 2012
Mahesh @ Dargonda Basgonda Patil & Anr. .. Petitioners
Vs
The Gramvikas Adhikari & Ors.
.. Respondents
Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP for the State
CORAM : D. D. SINHA &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ
DATE : 17th SEPTEMBER, 2012.
P.C.:
1. None present for the Petitioners.
2. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
[ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J ] [ D. D. SINHA, J ]z
jfoanz vkacsjdj
Pg 1 of 1
Mahesh @ Dargonda Basgonda Patil & Anr.
The Gramvikas Adhikari & Ors.
D. D. Sinha
V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
