Rule discharged and writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as no counsel engaged and nothing survives due to efflux of time.
Rule discharged and petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2310wp2115.92
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.2115 OF 1992
(The Graduate Engineers' Association vs. The Maharashtra State Electricity Board and others)
__________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Shri R.E. Moharir, Advocate for respondent no.1.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND P.B. VARALE, JJ.
DATED : OCTOBER 23, 2012
In spite of being duly served with notice for engagement of another Counsel, neither petitioner no.1 nor petitioner no.2 has engaged any Counsel. It appears that by efflux of time, nothing survives in the petition. As such, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Rule discharged.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
The Graduate Engineers' Association
The Maharashtra State Electricity Board
B.R. Gavai
P.B. Varale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
