Petitioner alleged Respondent, a Senior Inspector of Police, illegally prohibited employing ladies in his restaurant. Respondent denied making such a direction and claimed the restaurant remained open. The Court found no ground to entertain the matter and dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed. Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
kvm
1
WPL168_12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (LD.)NO. 168 OF 2012
Keshavlal Najibhai Chawda ..... Petitioner Vs. Vasant Patil & Ors. ..... Respondents
Ms. Veena Thadani, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr.Shekhar Ingawale, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & R.D. DHANUKA, JJ. DATE : 1 st FEBRUARY, 2012.
P.C. :
Rule, returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service. Heard finally by consent of parties.
kvm
2
WPL168_12
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to entertain a writ petition alleging an illegal oral direction by a senior police officer prohibiting employment of ladies in a restaurant.
Whether the alleged closure of the petitioner's restaurant vindicates the need for judicial intervention.
Keshavlal Najibhai Chawda
Vasant Patil
S.A. Bobde
R.D. Dhanuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
