The writ petition was disposed of as the Education Officer granted the relief claimed by the petitioner after the notice was issued, leaving nothing to survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
0708wp2037.12.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 2037 OF 2012
(Sau. Madhuri Mukund Landge Vs. The State of Maharashtra & others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr. A. R. Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A. G. Mujumdar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
CORAM : S. C. DHARMADHIKARI &
M. T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 07 AUGUST, 2012
The Petitioner’s Advocate fairly states
that after the notice was issued in this Writ Petition, the Education Officer has granted the relief claimed by the petitioner, and therefore, nothing survives in the Writ Petition.
The Writ Petition is accordingly
disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE
wwl
Madhuri Mukund Landge
The State of Maharashtra
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
M. T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
