Petitioner sought to withdraw the Criminal Writ Petition stating sought reliefs were rendered infructuous. Court dismissed the Writ Petition as withdrawn.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw the petition; Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Criminal Writ Petition No. 170 of 2009 [Marotrao Mahadeorao Deshmukh Vs. State of Mah. & others]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. M.R. Joshi, Adv., for the petitioner.
Mr. A.S. Sonare, APP for respondent nos. 1 and 2.
Mr. R.J. Shinde, Adv., for respondent nos. 3 and 4.
CORAM: P.V. HARDAS AND
M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ.
DATE : 29th August, 2012.
Mr. Joshi, learned counsel for the
petitioner, states on instructions that the
petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this
petition, as the reliefs which the petitioner
has sought for in this petition have been
rendered infructuous.
This Writ Petition is accordingly
dismissed as withdrawn. Rule stands discharged.
No costs.
JudgeJudge
|Hedau|
2
Marotrao Mahadeorao Deshmukh
State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
M.L. Tahaliyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court