The High Court declined to entertain a writ petition challenging a revisional order because the impugned order lacked specific directions to the adjudicating authority, leaving contentions open for fresh consideration.
Petition disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1255-12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1255 OF 2012
M/s. Forbes & Co. Ltd.
(Formerly known as Forbes Gokak Ltd.) & Anr.
..Petitioners.
V/s.
Union of India & Ors.
..Respondents.
Mr.V.R.Dhond, senior Advocate i/b. A.Mehta Laljee & Co. for the petitioners.
Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly for the respondents.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND R.D. DHANUKA, JJ.
DATED : 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2012
P.C. :-
restored the matter to the file of the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration in accordance with law.
1/2,
sas
wp1255-12
costs.
2/2,
sas
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Forbes & Co. Ltd. (Formerly known as Forbes Gokak Ltd.)
Union of India
J.P. Devadhar
R.D. Dhanuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
