The Bombay High Court disposed of a writ petition concerning amended bye-laws of a co-operative society, citing compliance by the Commissioner of Co-operation. The court held that the prayer regarding election was infructuous as elections had already taken place.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1123.11
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1123 OF 2011
Santosh s/o Rangnath Pandhare
.. PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
& others
.. RESPONDENTS
Mr. N. B. Suryawanshi, advocate holding for Mr V.R. Dhorde, advocate for petitioner.
Mrs. A. V. Gondhalekar, AGP for the State.
Mr. P. G. Patil, advocate for respondent nos. 3 and 4.
=====
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 27th AUGUST, 2012.
PER COURT :
. We therefore dispose of the Writ Petitions by accepting the statement made on behalf of the
wp1123.11
2
respondent-authorities of taking the necessary steps for amending the bye-laws, as stated in the affidavit. The same shall be completed either by the Societies or in the event, the Society do not comply, then by the concerned Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies / District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, within a period of six (6) months from today.
CHIEF JUSTICE
R. M. BORDE, J.
dyb
Santosh s/o Rangnath Pandhare
The State of Maharashtra
MOHIT S. SHAH
R. M. BORDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
