This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cwp110.12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.110 OF 2012
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
None present for the Petitioner.
Shri.S.D.Kaldate, A.P.P. for Respondents.
....
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND
T.V. NALAWADE, JJ.
DATE : 28TH MARCH, 2012.
1. The counsel for the Petitioner was
absent on last occasion. Even today also
none appears for the Petitioner. The Writ
Petitionisdismissedfornon
prosecution.
[T.V. NALAWADE,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.]
asb/MAR12
FARAD
Respondents
NARESH H. PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court