Petitioner's writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn upon permission granted by the Court.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-1047-12.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1047 OF 2012
Rajendra Pundlikrao Godshalwar, Sole Proprietor of Godshalwar Project Consultants & Developers.
... Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others.
... Respondents
Mr. Sanjay Kadam and Ms.Apeksha Sharma i/by M/s. Kadam & Co. for the petitioners.
Mr.Parag A. Vyas with Mr. Vinod Joshi for respondent No.1. Ms. Sharmila Deshmukh for respondent No.3.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. &
N.M. JAMDAR, J.
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
P .C.
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that since MCZMA has already passed an order in favour of the petitioner, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition.
CHIEF JUSTICE
N.M. JAMDAR, J.
1 of 1
SRK
Rajendra Pundlikrao Godshalwar
Union of India
MOHIT S. SHAH
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
