The suit was disposed of pursuant to consent terms between the plaintiff and defendant no. 1, as recorded by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay.
Suit disposed of in terms of consent terms between plaintiff and defendant no. 1.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 579 OF 2010
M/s. Machinfabrik
… Plaintiff
Versus
M/s.Biovet Private Ltd. And Anr. … Defendants
Mr. R.R. Singh i/by M/s. Israni and Associates for the plaintiff.
Ms. June Goveia i/by M/s. Thakore Jariwala Associates for Defendant Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA,J. DATED : JULY 06, 2012
P.C.
The parties have tendered consent terms between the plaintiff and
defendant no. 1. The consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” for
identification. The suit is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. The
defendant through the learned counsel has handed over documents referred to
in the consent terms to the learned counsel for the plaintiff in court.
(R.D. DHANUKA,J.)
Nilegaonkar
R.D. DHANUKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
