The court disposed of the appeal by abatement because the appellant's counsel appeared to have failed to secure legal representation on record as previously ordered.
The appeal abated and stood disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 S.A. 323...........1990
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SECOND APPEAL NO. 323 OF 1990
Mandodaribai W/o Narayan Shinde & Anr. V/s Deorao Nana Gholap
Mr. S.S.Choudhari, Advocate for the Appellants.
SECOND APPEAL NO. 324 OF 1990
Mandodaribai W/o Narayan Shinde & Anr. V/s Deorao Nana Gholap
Mr. S.S.Choudhari, Advocate for the Appellants.
Office Notes,Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram,appearances, ................................ Court's orders or CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. directions and Registrar's orders DATE : 19/06/2012.
PER COURT :
2 S.A. 323...........1990
representatives of the appellants on record.
[ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ]
KNP/S.A. 323...........1990
Mandodaribai W/o Narayan Shinde
Deorao Nana Gholap
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
