strenuously contends that, the CIDCO was brought within the Municipal limits of Aurangabad on 03rd December, 1982. The suit was filed on 03rd November, 1982. On 03.12.1982 as the CIDCO came within the municipal limits of Aurangabad, the provisions of Hyderabad Houses (Rent, Eviction, Lease) Control Act 1954 (hereafter after referred as to the “Rent Act” for the sake of brevity) became applicable. The civil court did not have the jurisdiction to decide the said suit. The learned counsel relying on Sec. 1 of the Rent Act states that the said Act has come into force at once. The learned counsel further contends that no separate notification is required for applicability of the act. Even if the suit premises have been subsequently included within the municipal limits, by operation of statute the Rent Act becomes applicable. The learned counsel further contends that the Rent Act is a beneficial legislation meant for protection of tenants and it shall be applicable to the pending proceedings. The learned counsel further refers to Sec. 15(1) of the Rent Act and submits that in view of said provision, even in execution of the decree or otherwise the tenant cannot be evicted except in accordance with provisions of Sec. 15 of the Rent Act. As tenant cannot be evicted except as per the provisions of Sec. 15, then the Civil Court could not get the jurisdiction to execute the decree. It
