In PIL No.73 of 2011, the court rejected the petitioner's prayers, finding the raised issue devoid of merit. The petition was dismissed accordingly.
The petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1502pil73.11.odt
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR.
PUBLIC INTERST LITIGATION NO.73 of 2011.
Aparajit Anandrao Ninawe
..vs..
Dr.S.Y.Kuraishi, Chief Election Commissioner and anr.
=-=-==-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Court's or Judges Order Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Petitioner in-person.
C ORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR AND
P.B.VARALE, JJ.
DATED: 15th FEBRUARY, 2012.
Considering the issue raised in the present petition, we do not find any substance at all for giving direction as prayed for in the petition.
The petition is, therefore, dismissed.
JUDGE JUDGE.
chute
1502pil73.11.odt 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to the directions prayed for in the public interest litigation.
Aparajit Anandrao Ninawe
Dr.S.Y.Kuraishi
P.B.Majmudar
P.B.Varale
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court