The PIL was dismissed as it was not present for the petitioner, resulting in the dismissal for want of prosecution. It is a single-line order with no substantive content.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
P.I.L. NO. 33 OF 2012
Pramod Jana Patil
.. Petitioner
Vs
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
.. Respondents
None for the Petitioner
Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP for the State
CORAM : D. D. SINHA &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ
DATE : 19th JULY, 2012.
P.C.:
[ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J ] [ D. D. SINHA, J ]z
jfoanz vkacsjdj
Pg 1 of 1
Pramod Jana Patil
State of Maharashtra
Ors.
D. D. SINHA
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
