Notices of Motion seeking to fix hearing dates in two writ petitions were rejected. The bench observed that prior representation that matters were covered by previous decisions was inaccurate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3.08.doc
1
SQP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3 OF 2008 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.663 OF 2007
Farida N.Khory ...Petitioner
Versus Air India Ltd. (now National Aviation Company of India Ltd. & Ors. ) ...Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.52 OF 2008 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1731 OF 2003
Valerie Fernandez ...Petitioner
Versus Air India Limited (now National Aviation Company of India Ltd. & Ors. ) …Respondent
Mr.Mohan Bir Singh in support of Notices of Motion.
Ms.Kavita Anchan i/b M/s.M.V.Kini & Co. to oppose Notices of Motion.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND
R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED:- OCTOBER 25, 2012. P.C.
on the argument that the statement made by the Counsel for the
petitioners on the previous date that the matters are fully covered by
1/2
SQ Pathan
3.08.doc
2
the two decisions referred to in the order dated 15th October, 2012 is inaccurate. In that case, the writ petitions will have to be heard on merits and cannot be disposed of as fully covered by the two decisions of this Court.
hearing of writ petitions cannot be entertained. Same is rejected. Writ petitions to proceed as per its turn under appropriate caption.
( R.Y.GANOO, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
2/2
SQ Pathan
Farida N.Khory
Air India Ltd.
Valerie Fernandez
Air India Limited
A.M.KHANWILKAR
R.Y.GANOO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
