The Court condoned the 165-day delay in filing an appeal due to sufficient cause shown by the applicant's counsel and made the Notice of Motion absolute.
Notice of Motion is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
60912
Vgm.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 609 OF 2012 IN APPEAL LODGING NO. 103 OF 2012 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2012 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 4561 OF 1996
Gunvantrai Shivlal Gupta ...Applicant/Appellant
V/s.
Snehlata Chhotalal Mody & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Dinesh C. Shah for the Applicant
None for the Respondents
CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J., & N.M. JAMDAR, J. DATE: AUGUST 21, 2012
P.C.:-
Learned counsel for the applicant states that the respondents have been served with the copy of the Notice of Motion, along with his letter dated 12 March, 2012. He states that the respondents were served through courier on
Page 1 of 2
60912
Vgm.
13 March, 2012. Learned counsel undertakes to file affidavit of service within one week.
CHIEF JUSTICE
N.M. JAMDAR, J.
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 165 days in filing the appeal is condonable.
Whether the Notice of Motion for condonation of delay should be made absolute.
Gunvantrai Shivlal Gupta
Snehlata Chhotalal Mody & Ors.
Mohit S. Shah
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
