The High Court condoned a five-day delay in filing an appeal. The Notice of Motion was declared absolute and disposed of without substantive adjudication on the merits of the underlying suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
nm-1486-12
gopi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1486 OF 2012
IN
APPEAL STAMP NO.446 OF 2012
IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3129 OF 2011
IN
SUIT NO.2588 OF 2011
Mahendra K. Ghelani & Ors.
..Appellants
Versus
Kalpana Anantarao Kakkad & Ors.
..Respondents.
Ms. Chhaya Asher i/b. Rustamji & Ginwala for the appellants. Mr. S.Y. Mulani i/b. Mulani & Co., for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 10 August 2012.
P.C.
Having heard the learned counsel for the appellants/applicants, the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and since the other respondents have been served, we find that sufficient cause has been shown for condonation of delay of 5 days in filing the Appeal. The delay is condoned. Notice of Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Notice of Motion stands disposed of accordingly.
CHIEF JUSTICE
(N.M. JAMDAR, J.)
1/1
Mahendra K. Ghelani & Ors.
Kalpana Anantarao Kakkad & Ors.
MOHIT S. SHAH
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
