Notice of motion for condonation of delay in filing an appeal was heard. The court found sufficient cause was shown for a 30-day delay and granted the application.
Condonation of a delay of 30 days for filing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NMA1082-12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1082 OF 2012 IN
APPEAL NO.739 OF 2011
Hindustan Unilever Limited. … Appellant Vs
Ashique Chemicals & ors. … Respondents
Dr.Virendra Tulzapurkar a/w Mr.Alankar Kirpekar & Mr.Muralidhar Khadilkar, for appellant.
Mr. Mustafa Safiyuddin with Mr.Nishad Nadkarni, Mr.Shailendra Bhandare and Ms.Meghana Chandorkar i/b Legasis Partners, for respondents.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. &
N.M. JAMDAR J. Tuesday, July 17, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel.
CHIEF JUSTICE
N.M.JAMDAR, J.
Mlns
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is shown to condone a delay of 30 days in filing an appeal.
Hindustan Unilever Limited
Ashique Chemicals
Mohit S. Shah
N.M. Jandhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
