Disposed
The Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs Nasik v. M/S Ravi Enterprises and Anr.
Bombay HCNMA/1054/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
hvn
1
NMA1054.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1054 OF 2012 IN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 136 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Central Excise
.... Applicant
Versus
M/s. Ravi Enterprises and Anr. ..... Respondents
Mr. S.M. Oak for the appellants.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR &
R.D. DHANUKA, JJ. DATE : 18th SEPTEMBER, 2012.
P.C. :
None for the respondents though served.
For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of Notice of Motion, the delay is condoned. Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
(R.D. DHANUKA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
The Commissioner of Central Excise
M/s. Ravi Enterprises and Anr.
J.P. Devadhar
R.D. Dhanuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court