This criminal public interest litigation was rejected because the petition failed to disclose whether the petitioner had adopted the procedure mandated by the Supreme Court in Kunga Nima Lepcha & Ors.
Criminal Public Interest Litigation is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dixit
CRPIL(ST.)-20-12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (ST.) NO.20 OF 2012
Ashok Bansidhar Agarwal … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Jagdish, i/b. Mr. Ranvir Shekhawat, for the Petitioner.
Ms. A.S. Pai, APP, for the Respondent-State.
Mr. A.M. Saraogi for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & R.G. KETKAR, JJ.
DATE : 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2012.
P.C. :
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner complied with the procedural requirements laid down in Kunga Nima Lepcha & Ors. case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kunga Nima Lepcha & Ors. V/s. State of Sikkim & Ors.Referred¶12
Ashok Bansidhar Agarwal
The State of Maharashtra
S.A. Bobde
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
