A single judge disposed of a contempt petition filed against a cooperative society for non-supply of account extracts as per court order after the accounts were eventually supplied.
Contempt petition disposed of. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cp 97.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 97 OF 2012 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5901 OF 2011
Hariram Vensimal Bharwani .. Petitioner
Versus
Santoshimata Credit Coop. Society and another .. Respondents
Shri S. S. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri P. R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Shri K. J. Ghute Patil, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 04TH MAY, 2012.
PER COURT :
. Shri Kulkarni, the learned counsel submits that the respondent No. 1 did not supply the extract of account as directed by this Court. After lot of persuasion only extract of 2005 has been supplied. According to the learned counsel this is clear contempt of the orders passed by this Court.
2 cp 97.12
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/May 12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to file the petition given the belated supply of the extract of account by the respondent.
Hariram Vensimal Bharwani
Santoshimata Credit Co-op. Society
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
