Contempt petition disposed. Respondent filed affidavit confirming premises vacated and possession handed over; no further issues survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
19 cp.72.12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 72 OF 2012
,In WP/4298/2008
PRECISION PATTERN WORKS THR PROPRIETOR
VERSUS
ROHIDAS WARAJI NISARGANDH
Advocate for Petitioner : R B Bhumkar
Advocate for Respondent : S.R.Bodade.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 10th July, 2012.
P.C.
. When the petition is called out for hearing, none
appears for the Petitioner.
2 The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent submits that, already suit premises are vacated on 3rd July, 2012. The possession is handed over to the landlord / Petitioner. The learned counsel for the Respondent has tendered across the bar the affidavit of the Respondent. Same is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification purpose. In the light of
2
19 cp.72.12
above, nothing further survives for consideration in this contempt petition. The contempt petition stands disposed of.
[ S.S. SHINDE, J ]
ndm
Precision Pattern Works Thr Proprietor
Rohidas Waraji Nisargandh
S.S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
