The Court disposed of a contempt petition because the respondent complied with the order by issuing an appointment order to the petitioner upon completion of probation. No costs were awarded.
The contempt petition is disposed of. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 36 OF 2012
Office Notes,Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram,appearances, ................................ Court's orders or CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. directions and Registrar's orders DATE : 07/05/2012.
Mr. A.S.Shelke, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. S.D.Shelke, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for State.
PER COURT :
KNP/C.P. 36.2012
Petitioner
State
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
