This is a brief order in a contempt petition where the petitioner, through counsel, stated that the matter was not being pressed due to an affidavit filed by the respondent's department. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Contempt Petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
60 cp246-10.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.246 OF 2010
Shri Dinkarrao Ramchandra Patil .. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.S.A.Rajeshirke for the petitioner
Mr.A.I.Patel, A.G.P. for the respondents
CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. DATE : 22nd OCTOBER, 2012
P.C.
failed and neglected to comply the order dt.20.1.98 and 4.12.03 passed by Division Bench of this court in Writ Petition No.5917 of 1996.
1/2
60 cp246-10.doc
(K.K.TATED, J.)
Mohite
2/2
Shri Dinkarrao Ramchandra Patil
The State of Maharashtra
KK TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
