IN
The Company Petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as per a prior order dated 27th July 2012.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 253-cp-187-12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 187 OF 2012.
Madan Lachmandas Asrani (HUF). ..Petitioner.
vs.
Peacock Media Limited. ..Respondent.
Mr. Pratap B. Kapadia, for Petitioner.
Mr. Ramesh Jain, i/b. Mr. Ramesh Jain & Kusum Jain, for Respondent.
CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE :- 3RD OCTOBER, 2012.
P.C.
In view of order dated 27th July 2012, both counsel fairly state that the Company Petition already stood dismissed for nonprosecution.
( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. )
jmi 1/1
Madan Lachmandas Asrani (HUF)
Peacock Media Limited
Anoop V. Motta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
