The Court disposed of two Company Petitions as infructous in view of a prior order dated 30th July 2012 that made them redundant. No substantive issues were decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CP 167 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICTURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.167 of 2011
Hewlett Packard Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. .....Petitioner Versus Spanco BPO Services Ltd. …..Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.168 OF 2011 Hewlett Packard Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. .....Petitioner Versus Spanco Ltd. …..Respondent
Mr.Veeral Vakharia i/by M/s.Solomon and Co., for Petitioners. Mr.Zal Andhyarujina i/by M/s.Phoenix Legal, for Respondents.
CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE: 3 rd AUGUST 2012
P.C. :
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
1/1
ssp
Hewlett Packard Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Spanco BPO Services Ltd.
Spanco Ltd.
S.J.KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
