Multiple contempt petitions were dismissed because the petitioner indicated a lack of intent to press them following the filing of an affidavit by respondent no.1.
Dismissed all contempt petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp122-1gr.doc
1
ttm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.122 OF 2010 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.123 OF 2010 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.124 OF 2010 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.125 OF 2010 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.126 OF 2010 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.127 OF 2010 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.128 OF 2010 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.129 OF 2010 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.130 OF 2010 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.303 OF 2009
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Mr.A.R.Metkari for the petitioner
Ms.Tanmayi Gadre i/b Mr.Abhijit Desai for respondent no.1
Mr.A.I.Patel, A.G.P. for respondent no.3
CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. DATE : 27/02/2012
cp122-1gr.doc
PC :
reply filed by respondent no.1, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on the instructions of his client states that petitioners do not want to press all the present contempt petitions.
(K.K.TATED, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondent no.1
Respondent no.3
K.K.TATIED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
