Contempt petitions challenging orders and alleged demolition without due process were disposed of when respondents affirmed adherence to legal provisions via special duty officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cp 103.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 103 OF 2012
IN
SUO MOTU CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 241 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5122 OF 2008
Kulsumbee Abdul Rashid and others .. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri D. P. Palodkar, Advocate for Petitioners. Smt. R. K. Ladda, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State. Shri Umakant Patil, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5.
WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 121 OF 2012 IN
SUO MOTU CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 241 OF 2008 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5122 OF 2008
Ambadas Narsingrao Sarwade and others.. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri D. P. Palodkar, h/f Shri A. P. Phatale, Advocate for Petitioner
2 cp 103.12
Smt. S. D. Shelke, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State. Shri A. M. Karad, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 02ND MAY, 2012.
PER COURT :
. These are the contempt petitions filed on the ground that the orders of the Court are been violated and the properties of the petitioners are sought to be demolished without following the due process of law.
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/May 12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt petitions regarding alleged violation of court orders and indiscriminate property demolition are maintainable.
Kulsumbee Abdul Rashid and others
Ambadas Narsingrao Sarwade and others
The State of Maharashtra and others
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
