Mohamed Yusuf Khatri v. Th Principal-St.John Convent High School and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
krs
caw957.03
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.957 OF 2003
IN
REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.9828/2003 IN PIL NO.89 OF 2002
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
None present for the applicant. Mr.A.G.Kothari for respondent no.1.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 14, 2012. P.C.:
Counsel for the applicant absent. Civil Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
1 of 1
Applicant
Respondent No.1
D.D. Sinha
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court