The High Court of Nagpur rejected the civil application arising out of a writ petition concerning office notes and memoranda, with no substantive reasoning provided in the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
0103caw548.12
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 548 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6369 OF 2011
(Nagorao s/o Narayan Mahure vs. State Government of Maharashtra and others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Shri Phadnis, Advocate for applicant/petitioner. Shri D.B. Yangal, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos.1 and 3.
CORAM : S.A. BOBDE AND P.B. VARALE, JJ.
DATED : MARCH 1, 2012
The civil application for speaking to minutes is rejected.
JUDGE
JUDGE
khj
Nagorao s/o Narayan Mahure
State Government of Maharashtra
S.A. Bobde
P.B. Varale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
