Disposed
Union of India and Anr. v. Ramesh Kumar Mishra
Bombay HCCAW/2377/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
krs
caw2377.10
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2377 OF 2010 In
WRIT PETITION NO.1098 OF 2009
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr.R.G.Walia for the applicant. Mr.J.E.Koyande i/b. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the original petitioners.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA &
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 03, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the original petitioners.
1 of 2
krs
caw2377.10
by the applicant. In view of old Writ Petitions pending for final hearing, it is difficult for us to consider the request of the applicant at this stage. However, if the Writ Petition is not heard on merit within a reasonable time, it will be open for the applicant to make a similar request. With these observations, the Civil Application is disposed of.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
Suundaresan
2 of 2
Applicant
Original Petitioners
D.D. SINHA
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court