The High Court allowed a civil application dismissing a consecutive default petition after accepting the explanation for the applicant's legal representative's absence.
Civil Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a); Writ Petition set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ASN
CAW-212.sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.212 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5404 OF 2011
Guna Ram Das. ..Applicant.
s.
The Commissioner, Kendria Vidyalaya and ors. ..Respondents.
Mr.A.R.Pitale for the Applicant.
CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & SHRI. M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
25 JANUARY 2012
PC:
The writ petition was dismissed in default on 2 August 2011. In paragraph 4 of the Civil Application, the reason for non appearance of the advocate has been explained. In the circumstances, we allow the civil application in terms of prayer clause (a).
( DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J )
( SHRI. M.S. SANKLECHA, J. )
Guna Ram Das
The Commissioner, Kendria Vidyalaya and ors
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
M.S. SANKLECHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
