Single-judge civil application that allows the naming of additional applicants to avoid delay. No substantive legal principle or outcome regarding the dispute is recorded.
Permission granted to add the Applicants to the application to avoid further delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw1975.12.sxw
1
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1975 OF 2012 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4502 OF 2006
Suresh Abhimanyu Patil & Ors. ......Applicants.
AND
Sunil Pralhad Khomane …..Petitioners
Vs.
Bajaj Auto Limited ......Respondents.
Ms. Jane Cox for the Applicants.
Ms. Rajlaxmi Punjabi i/by M/s. M.S. Bodhanwalla & Co. for the Respondents.
CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE :- 11 SEPTEMBER 2012.
P.C.:-
Not on board, mentioned. Taken on board, alongwith connected matters.
I am inclined to add the name of the Applicants, as they were admittedly party before the lower Court. Therefore, to avoid further delay, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). The parties to take steps accordingly.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Suresh Abhimanyu Patil
Sunil Pralhad Khomane
Bajaj Auto Limited
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
