Single-judge order dismissing no specific context. The court considers averments sufficient to allow a civil application and restores a petition to the file for admission. No substantive legal issue or precedent is engaged.
Civil application allowed in terms of prayers (a) and (b); petition restored to file and listed for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23-caw-1933-12.sxw
1
dgm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CAW/ 1933/2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4428 OF 2010
Balku Lingappa Mangave .... Applicant vs Shri Panchganga Co.op. Sugar Factor Ltd. Ganganagar .... Respondent
.... Applicant
Ms. R.D. Musale i/by Mr. D.V.Sutgar for the Applicant. None for respondent.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : August 28, 2012
P.C.:
Considering the averments made and as case is made out, Civil
Application is allowed in terms of prayers (a) and (b). Civil Application is disposed of accordingly.
2 The Petition is restored to file and be listed for admission accordingly.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Balku Lingappa Mangave
Shri Panchganga Co.op. Sugar Factor Ltd. Ganganagar
Anoop V. Motya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
