The High Court disposed of a civil application as not pressed by the counsels for the parties due to subsequent developments and existing orders. No separate orders were passed regarding the pending pursis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw1910.11-Orde r
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLN. (W) NO.1910/2011
AND
PURSIS ST. NO.7129/2011
IN
WRIT PETN. NO.4889/2009
Shri Tukaram Shikshan Sanstha
-vs-
State of Maharashtra and others
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders
Court's or Judge's Orders.
or directions and Registrar's orders.
Ms U. R. Tanna, counsel for the applicant-petitioner.
Shri A.M.Deshpande, AGP for the respondent Nos.1 to 3.
None for the respondent No.4.
Shri S.V. Sirpurkar, counsel for the respondent Nos.5 and 6.
Shri M.V.Samarth, counsel for the respondent Nos.7 to 13.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 21.08.2012.
CIVIL APPLN. NO.1910/2011
Heard.
The learned counsel for the applicant states
that the applicant is not desirous of pressing the application in view of the order dated 07/08/2012. Hence, the application is disposed of as not pressed.
caw1910.11-Orde r
2/2
PURSIS ST. NO.7129/2011
In view of the subsequent developments, the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.7 to 13 does not want to press the statements made in the pursis. Hence, no formal orders are necessary on the same.
JUDGE JUDGE
KHUNTE
Shri Tukaram Shikshan Sanstha
State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A. Naik
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
