The High Court of Bombay restored a writ petition previously dismissed in default, condoning the delay, and then disposed of the application without further adjudication.
Restoration of the petition and disposal of the civil application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
dmt 1/1
ca1473-12.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1473 OF 2012 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1302 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2713 OF 2010
Prabhakar Uttam Latake.
..Applicant.
versus
District Social Welfare Officer Solapur & Ors.
..Respondents.
None for the Applicant/Petitioner.
Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP., for the Respondents.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AND A.A. SAYED, JJ.
28 AUGUST 2012.
P.C. :
Delay is condoned since sufficient cause is shown.
(DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
Prabhakar Uttam Latake
District Social Welfare Officer Solapur
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
