Disposed
Jagannath Krishna Karle v. Bhalseth Babaji Mudras
Bombay HCCAS/802/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
913 cas802-10.sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.802 OF 2010 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.349 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Mr.V.C.Ghosalkar for the applicant
Mr.Rajesh S. Jadhav for the respondent
CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. DATE : 14/08/2012 PC :
1/2
913 cas802-10.sxw
2
of admission of the present Second Appeal on 16.06.2011, this court (Coram: V.M.Kanade, J.) directed both the parties to maintain status quo. Para 4 of the said order reads thus:
“Parties are directed to maintain status quo. In the meanwhile, impugned order is stayed. Hearing of the Second Appeal is expedited. Parties may prepare private paper book and apply for fixed date of hearing.”
till the hearing and final disposal of Second Appeal.
(K.K.TATED, J.)
Mohite
2/2
Original Defendant
Respondent
K.K.Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court