Civil Application filed for recalling orders dismissing a Letters Patent Appeal and a restoration application was allowed on payment of court fees by the Legal Services Committee.
Orders recalled; Civil Application and Letters Patent Appeal restored; Costs of Rs. 5,000 to Legal Services Committee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
krs
cao88.12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.88 OF 2012
In
CIVIL APPLCIATION NO.3/2012 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.196/2011
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr.P.M.Chakurkar for the applicant. Mr.Ashish Kamath i/b. Shiralkar & Co., for resp.no.1. Mr.Mahesh Londhe i/b. Sanjay Udeshi & Co., for respondent nos.10 to 21.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA &
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : JULY 16, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the respective respondents.
1 of 3
krs
cao88.12
No.3 of 2012 and L.P.A. No.196 of 2011.
and perused the Civil Application. In the interest of justice, we allow the present Civil Application subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the High Court Legal Services Committee within a period of two weeks. The applicant is directed to submit the acknowledgment of payment of costs in the Registry, on the basis thereof the order dated 17.1.2012 as well as the order dated 9.11.2011 shall stand recalled and the Civil Application as well as the LPA shall stand 2 of 3
krs
cao88.12
restored to the file of this Court.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
3 of 3
Suundaresan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil application for recalling orders and restoration of earlier applications should be allowed due to default in filing?
Applicant
Respondent no.1
D.D. Sinha
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
