The applicant filed a civil application in a family court appeal. The court observed that the underlying appeal had been withdrawn. Consequently, the current application was disposed of with no substantive orders or reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S
1 cam286.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.286 OF 2011 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.83 OF 2011
Bharati Bhausaheb Aher .. Applicant. Vs. Bhausaheb Kautik Aher .. Respondent.
Mr.J.D.Khairnar for the appellant.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & P. D. KODE, JJ.
DATED : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2012
P.C.
(P. D. KODE, J.)
(V. M. KANADE, J.)
Bharati Bhausaheb Aher
Bhausaheb Kautik Aher
V. M. Kanade
P. D. Kode
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
