An application was allowed in parts pending respondent appearance. Amendment to the application was permitted within three weeks coupled with affidavit of service filing.
Application allowed under prayer clauses (a) and (1a); amendment permitted within three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-caf-2211-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2211 OF 2012 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.928 OF 2012
Shri Pradip S. Shetye .. Applicant. V/s. Shri Prakash V. Kolwalkar & Others .. Respondents.
.. Respondents.
Mr. Avinash R. Belge, for the Applicant. None for the Respondents.
CORAM: A.S.OKA &
SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.J.
DATE : 9th AUGUST, 2012.
P.C:-
The learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant has pointed
out that on 3rd August, 2012, he has filed Affidavit of Service, annexing thereto the acknowledgments signed by the proposed legal representatives. None appears for the proposed legal representatives.
2 In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (1a).
(SHRIHARI P. DAVARE,J.)
(A.S.OKA.J.)
1 of 1
S.R.JOSHI
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the application for allowing affidavits of service to be filed.
Whether to permit amendment to the application.
Shri Pradip S. Shetye
Shri Prakash V. Kolwalkar & Others
A.S. OKA
Shrihari P. Davare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
