The High Court disposed of four civil applications filed by senior citizen original appellants to fix an early hearing date for pending first appeals, granting liberty to apply again when they are ready.
Liberty granted to applicants to approach the court to fix an early date for hearing when first appeals are ready.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
7.caf.1141.12.group
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1141 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 419 OF 2009
Vinit Agarwal ....Applicant. Versus State of Maharashtra and another ....Respondents.
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1142 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 445 OF 2009
Namdev Gandaram Shingade Versus State of Maharashtra and another
....Applicant. ....Respondents.
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1143 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 446 OF 2009
Premchand R. Bafna
Versus
State of Maharashtra and another
....Applicant. ....Respondents.
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1144 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 447 OF 2009
Embedded Resources Private Ltd. Versus
State of Maharashtra and another
....Applicant. ....Respondents.
Mr. Milind Jadhav and Ms. K. R. Daviervala i/b Mulla & Mulla for the Applicants.
1 of 2
S. S. MORMARE
2
7.caf.1141.12.group
Mr. A. R. Patil, AGP for the Respondent No. 1-State. Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad i/b A. M. Kulkarni for the Respondent No. 2.
CORAM: K. K. TATED, J. DATED : AUGUST 27, 2012.
P.C.:
These four Applications are preferred by the original Appellants for fixing an early date of hearing of the First Appeals on the ground that the Applicants are senior citizens.
2 of 2
S. S. MORMARE
Vinit Agarwal
Namdev Gandaram Shingade
Premchand R. Bafna
Embedded Resources Private Ltd.
State of Maharashtra
Another
K. K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
