The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad allowed an application for amendment within one week. The writ petition was adjourned for three weeks to enable the respondent to file a reply as a last chance.
Application for amendment allowed within one week; writ petition adjourned for three weeks for filing reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
ca675-12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 675 OF 2012 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 9449 OF 2011
Shivaji s/o Ganpatrao Kabade APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS
.....
Mr. N.D. Sonawane, advocate holding for Mr. V.D.
Hon, advocate for the applicant.
Mr. S.D. Kaldate, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State.
Mr. A.R. Salve, advocate for Respondent No. 2.
Mr. P.V. Barde, advocate for Respondent No. 5.
Mr. A.N. Sabnis, advocate for Respondent No. 6.
.....
DATED : 19th JANUARY, 2012
ORAL ORDER:
1.This is an application for amendment. For
the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed.
The amendment be carried out within period of one
week from today.
2.As far as writ petition is concerned, stand
over for three weeks at the request of learned
counsel appearing for Respondent No.6, for filing
reply, as a last chance.
[M.T. JOSHI, J.]
npj/ca675-12
[B.R. GAVAI, J.]
(2) ca675-12
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the application for amendment to the writ petition.
Whether to stand over the writ petition proceedings to allow the respondent to file a reply.
Shivaji s/o Ganpatrao Kabade
The State of Maharashtra
M.T. JOSHI
B.R. GAVAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court