Disposed

Nilesh Narayan Gharat v. the Official Liquidator of Sanjay Plywood Industries Pvt.Ltd.

Bombay HC24 Aug 2012CA/397/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Multiple company applications challenging orders rejecting claims under a liquidation petition. The High Court set aside orders passed by the Official Liquidator without reasons and directed fresh orders within four weeks after hearing the applicants' counsel.

What did the court decide?

Orders rejecting claims set aside; Official Liquidator directed to pass fresh reasoned orders within four weeks after hearing applicants' counsel.

Nilesh Narayan Gharat Vs the Official Liquidator of… — Company and Corporate | Bombay HC (2012)

¶1

CA 397 of 2012

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICTURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.397 OF 2012 IN

¶3

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶4

Kitply Industries Ltd. .....Petitioner Versus

¶5

The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd.

¶6

Industries Ltd. …Respondent And Nilesh Narayan Gharat ....Applicant

¶7

WITH

¶8

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.398 OF 2012 IN

¶9

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶10

Kitply Industries Ltd. .....Petitioner Versus

¶11

The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd. …Respondent And Ramchandra Madhav Gharat ....Applicant

¶12

WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.399 OF 2012 IN

¶13

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶14

Kitply Industries Ltd. .....Petitioner Versus

¶15

The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd.

¶16

Industries Ltd. …Respondent And Narendra Jagannath Gharat ....Applicant

¶17

WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.400 OF 2012

¶18

¶19

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶20

1/6

¶21

ssp

¶22

CA 397 of 2012 Kitply Industries Ltd. .....Petitioner Versus The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd. …Respondent And Rajendra Jagannath Gharat ....Applicant

¶23

WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.401 OF 2012 IN

¶24

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶25

Kitply Industries Ltd. .....Petitioner Versus The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd. …Respondent And Sadanand Dadu Bhoir ....Applicant WITH

¶26

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.402 OF 2012 IN

¶27

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶28

Kitply Industries Ltd. .....Petitioner Versus The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd. …Respondent And Mrs.Jyotsna Rajendra Patil ....Applicant WITH

¶29

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.403 OF 2012 IN

¶30

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶31

Kitply Industries Ltd. .....Petitioner Versus The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd. …Respondent And Rajesh Vipin Patil ....Applicant

2/6

ssp

CA 397 of 2012

WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.404 OF 2012

¶36

¶37

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶38

Kitply Industries Ltd. .....Petitioner Versus

¶39

The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd.

¶40

…Respondent

¶41

And

¶42

Vijay Nana Patil ....Applicant

¶43

WITH

¶44

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.405 OF 2012 IN

¶45

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶46

Kitply Industries Ltd.

¶47

.....Petitioner

¶48

Versus

¶49

The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd.

¶50

…Respondent

¶51

And

¶52

Dilip Ramchandra Mali ....Applicant

¶53

WITH

¶54

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.406 OF 2012

¶55

¶56

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶57

Kitply Industries Ltd.

¶58

Kitply Industries Ltd. .....Petitioner Versus The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd. …Respondent And Santosh Vasudeo Gharat ....Applicant

¶59

WITH

¶60

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.407 OF 2012

¶61

¶62

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶63

Kitply Industries Ltd.

.....Petitioner

3/6

ssp

CA 397 of 2012

Versus

The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd. …Respondent And Shashikant Bistir Patil ....Applicant

¶70

…Respondent

¶71

WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.408 OF 2012 IN

¶72

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶73

Kitply Industries Ltd. .....Petitioner Versus

¶74

The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd. And

¶75

…Respondent

¶76

Vikas Janardan Mhatre ....Applicant

¶77

WITH

¶78

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.409 OF 2012 IN

¶79

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶80

Kitply Industries Ltd. .....Petitioner Versus The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd. …Respondent And Mr.Gajanan Moreshwar Kandi ....Applicant

¶81

WITH

¶82

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.410 OF 2012 IN

¶83

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶84

Kitply Industries Ltd. .....Petitioner Versus The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd. …Respondent And Santosh Parshuram Kadu ....Applicant WITH

4/6

ssp

CA 397 of 2012

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.411 OF 2012 IN

¶89

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶90

Kitply Industries Ltd. Versus

¶91

.....Petitioner

¶92

The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd.

¶93

Industries Ltd. …Respondent And Deepak Yashvant Mestri ....Applicant

¶94

WITH

¶95

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.412 OF 2012 IN

¶96

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶97

Kitply Industries Ltd.

¶98

.....Petitioner

¶99

Versus

¶100

The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd.

¶101

…Respondent

¶102

And

¶103

Suman Dilip Dutkar ....Applicant

¶104

WITH

¶105

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.413 OF 2012 IN

¶106

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶107

Kitply Industries Ltd.

¶108

.....Petitioner

¶109

Versus

¶110

The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd.

¶111

Industries Ltd. …Respondent And Naresh Vasudeo Gharat ....Applicant

¶112

WITH

¶113

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.414 OF 2012 IN

¶114

COMPANY PETITION NO.523 OF 2005

¶115

Kitply Industries Ltd. Versus

.....Petitioner

5/6

ssp

CA 397 of 2012

The Official Liquidator of M/s.Sanjay Plywood Industries Ltd. …Respondent And Mrs.Rashmi Raghunath Mahimkar @ Ms. Malati Somayya Gavad ....Applicant

¶121

Mr.N.M.Ganguli, for Applicants.

¶122

Ms.Rupa Sutar, Asstt. Official Liquidator, present.

¶123

CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.

¶124

DATE: 24th AUGUST 2012

¶125

P.C. :

¶126

The orders passed by the Official Liquidator not admitting the claim of the Applicants in their entirety, are not supported by any reasons. The Office of the Official Liquidator is expected to give reasons in support of its orders, more so, when the Liquidator is not accepting the claims of the Applicants in their entirety. In view thereof, the orders passed by the Official Liquidator are set aside. The Official Liquidator shall after hearing the Advocate for the Applicants pass fresh orders giving reasons in the event of him not admitting the claims of the Applicants in their entirety within a period of four weeks from today. The above Company Applications are accordingly disposed of

¶127

( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )

¶128

6/6

¶129

ssp

Nilesh Narayan Gharat v. the Official Liquidator of Sanjay Plywood Industries Pvt.Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nilesh Narayan Gharat v. the Official Liquidator of Sanjay Plywood Industries Pvt.Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

L and T Finance Ltd. Vs Susanta Kumar P. Routary and Anr.

M/S. Ankita Knit Wear Ltd. Vs the Official Liquidator of Blue Bird(India) Limited

Mausam Films Ltd. Vs Eros International Films Pvt. Ltd.

Nrb Bearings Limited Vs

Nrb Industrial Bearings Ltd. Vs

L and T Finance Ltd. Vs Vikram Singh U. Grewal and Kamaljeet v. Grewal