The applicant filed a civil application to quash an earlier Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) which had already been dismissed in LPA No.66 of 2011. The High Court held that with the dismissal of the LPA, no ground for the civil application remained and rejected the same.
Civil Application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca3642.12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3642 OF 2012
IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.66 OF 2012 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.9483 OF 2011
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
Smt.M.A. Kulkarni Advocate for Applicant.
Shri.V.B. Ghatge AGP for Respondent Nos.
1 to 3 and 11.
....
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL &
S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 7TH MAY, 2012.
1. In view of the dismissal of Letters
Patent Appeal itself, nothing survives
forconsiderationintheCivil
Application. The Civil Application is
rejected.
[S.B. DESHMUKH,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.]
asb/MAY12
Smt.M.A. Kulkarni
Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and 11
NARESH H. PATIL
S.B. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court